Mission
Do people like the company - should have its mission? What really is the mission?
In an interesting discussion on Goldenline (group "clienting") one of them quoted the company's mission Zielona Budka. It went very easily and is, in my role model:
"
We want to shoot a good ice cream "
Let us compare it with the mission even Polish Telecom:
"
TP Group's goal is to provide the highest customer satisfaction and an attractive return to shareholders by achieving the position of choice provider of telecommunications services, multimedia and entertainment, making use of modern technology. "
It is true that you can see rdiscrepancies?
The mission for me is the answer to two questions - "what are you doing?" And "why are you?". The mission is a response to a question about the cause. Key in the formulation of the mission are three issues - the rule KKZ: The mission must be short. Just one sentence, a maximum of ten words. No more. The mission must be concrete. Zero waffling. The simple answer to simple question. The mission must be understood. If we identify with the mission, we need to understand not only whole but also the role and importance of each word. Must be expressed in very simple language.
So, are we as a people, we should have his "life's mission?
In my opinion the answer is yes221;. Well-articulated mission, with which I identify with - definitely helps in life, helps make decisions, thanks to her I am more certain that what I'm doing now is precisely the thing you should do. The mission makes everything more readable.
This current mission is very "green" - was born just a few days ago. Earlier in that it was poorly worded, was lying in the corner. Do not identify with it.
And an important note at the end - do not identify with the mission objective. My mission is not to win a million ... I always shied away from this, to establish a "life goal." Because if you set such a goal, what happens when you attain it? What mnie will continue to be kept alive, since everything important to me - already passed?
The mission is different from the order because it is valid for life. It does not answer the question about what you want to achieve. Instead, it suggests, and still retains some of what you do in life and why you do it. It is a good guideline.
Monday, 31 May 2010
Tuesday, 25 May 2010
Belgium Under The Table
What leads to success?
Gary Hamel in his book "Managing tomorrow (polecam!) described the key features that contribute to the creation of profit. Each assigned a specific weight, corresponding to the significance of which has a given feature. Statement presented in this way:
Enthusiasm - 35%
Creativity - 25%
The initiative - 20%
Intellect - 15%
Dutifulness - 5%
Obedience - 0%
After thinking of these figures suggests to me a few conclusions: Schools teach us things that are of little importance. Teachers put the assessment, define rules of conduct and require appropriate behavior, thus shaping the attitudes we obowiązkowośYou and obedience. Sometimes it happens that the school will contribute to the intellectual development - although this is rare. It is almost impossible to find a school that stimulates creativity, encourages, or to take initiative. Much more work is in the opposite direction and effectively to the school discourages. You can not overestimate the role of the intellect. In the memorable words to me straight, which I found somewhere on you tube - "You do not need to be fuckin Genious. Wisdom of the important but not critical. All we have are examples, even with the so-called show business:) But even apart from these extreme cases you need to realize that the game is not going to who will be the smartest. It's about who you arech wisest attract to each other and learn how to best use this wisdom. Each of these features can be at home to shape and refine. I do not believe that this is not the case with enthusiasm. I do not believe that people are enthusiastic and people-enthusiastic. The division is different. People are divided into those who do something because they have to do, and those who are doing something, because I love it. This second group is full of enthusiasm and joy at what he does share with others. This confirms the words of Einstein, "Imagination is more important than knowledge." Creativity, or the ability of creation, creation - plays a bigger role than the knowledge possessed, or even the level of intellectual development. In this day information and knowledge have become a cheap and wide-accessible. Becoming increasingly important to noticing what is invisible. Create and explore new opportunities.
Of course this is only a model, but in my opinion very accurate. Analyzing it must be remembered that although a zero percent obedience, it does not mean that it is completely irrelevant characteristic. The fact is, that obedience in many situations is important. Similarly, however, plays no role. The man who is only obedient, there is no chance of that, to achieve more and be more.
Gary Hamel in his book "Managing tomorrow (polecam!) described the key features that contribute to the creation of profit. Each assigned a specific weight, corresponding to the significance of which has a given feature. Statement presented in this way:
Enthusiasm - 35%
Creativity - 25%
The initiative - 20%
Intellect - 15%
Dutifulness - 5%
Obedience - 0%
After thinking of these figures suggests to me a few conclusions: Schools teach us things that are of little importance. Teachers put the assessment, define rules of conduct and require appropriate behavior, thus shaping the attitudes we obowiązkowośYou and obedience. Sometimes it happens that the school will contribute to the intellectual development - although this is rare. It is almost impossible to find a school that stimulates creativity, encourages, or to take initiative. Much more work is in the opposite direction and effectively to the school discourages. You can not overestimate the role of the intellect. In the memorable words to me straight, which I found somewhere on you tube - "You do not need to be fuckin Genious. Wisdom of the important but not critical. All we have are examples, even with the so-called show business:) But even apart from these extreme cases you need to realize that the game is not going to who will be the smartest. It's about who you arech wisest attract to each other and learn how to best use this wisdom. Each of these features can be at home to shape and refine. I do not believe that this is not the case with enthusiasm. I do not believe that people are enthusiastic and people-enthusiastic. The division is different. People are divided into those who do something because they have to do, and those who are doing something, because I love it. This second group is full of enthusiasm and joy at what he does share with others. This confirms the words of Einstein, "Imagination is more important than knowledge." Creativity, or the ability of creation, creation - plays a bigger role than the knowledge possessed, or even the level of intellectual development. In this day information and knowledge have become a cheap and wide-accessible. Becoming increasingly important to noticing what is invisible. Create and explore new opportunities.
Of course this is only a model, but in my opinion very accurate. Analyzing it must be remembered that although a zero percent obedience, it does not mean that it is completely irrelevant characteristic. The fact is, that obedience in many situations is important. Similarly, however, plays no role. The man who is only obedient, there is no chance of that, to achieve more and be more.
Saturday, 15 May 2010
Tech Deck Party Invitation
The most important skill
Alex on his blog once gave the formula for the calculation of its market value. It looks like this:
Our market value x = Professional skills Ability to sell yourself x Our contacts
A model for very fell into my memory and it is often the recall. They are very good in it included the most important determining factors. Today we will focus on two of them.
To be able to sell - need to communicate well, and precisely what we have to say. It was in the history of many who were offering something really valuable, and still have not reached success, because they could not sell it accordingly. An example of the opposite - a success story - a glorious last "Pudzian 'Pudzianowski. He sells very well. It is true that "little is said, a lot of doing, but communication is not only what we say, but as we speak. Besides Pudzian knows where to find and how to make a fuss around him. Ability to sell is exactly the same as the ability to communicate well. So that interested them the other side, showing all the best in us.
The same goes for networking. Odejdźmy But from talking about the network, and let's focus on the individual person. How can I build a relationship of such a person? How can I approach her? The simplest and most likely - through conversation. It's in the conversation until we find each other and talking, we can get to know nawzajem. Even if you do not gain friends, but "contacts" - that's for those business cards or hide people. To build relationships need to be able to talk and communicate with others.
Communicating to establish and maintain contact with people is the most important skills they should all learn. We can not acquire specialized knowledge in many areas, because we can not be experts in everything - we have to choose. But experts on good communication, we must be all.
Following is something that very much will help you to work on this communication. It is a mind map, which I took everything that I consider important is the topic to contact humans. Map powslegislation was mainly based on the book by Dale Carnegie "How to win friends and win over the people." Those who read it will recognize, however, that I added too much from myself:)
Just remember that it may be this map wyuczyć memory, but it still will not do anything if not everything przećwiczycie practice. It should talk:)
PS you need to click the map to be clearly visible. You may copy it, convert and share freely.
PSS What do you think of this as science and mindmapowej convey thoughts?
Alex on his blog once gave the formula for the calculation of its market value. It looks like this:
Our market value x = Professional skills Ability to sell yourself x Our contacts
A model for very fell into my memory and it is often the recall. They are very good in it included the most important determining factors. Today we will focus on two of them.
To be able to sell - need to communicate well, and precisely what we have to say. It was in the history of many who were offering something really valuable, and still have not reached success, because they could not sell it accordingly. An example of the opposite - a success story - a glorious last "Pudzian 'Pudzianowski. He sells very well. It is true that "little is said, a lot of doing, but communication is not only what we say, but as we speak. Besides Pudzian knows where to find and how to make a fuss around him. Ability to sell is exactly the same as the ability to communicate well. So that interested them the other side, showing all the best in us.
The same goes for networking. Odejdźmy But from talking about the network, and let's focus on the individual person. How can I build a relationship of such a person? How can I approach her? The simplest and most likely - through conversation. It's in the conversation until we find each other and talking, we can get to know nawzajem. Even if you do not gain friends, but "contacts" - that's for those business cards or hide people. To build relationships need to be able to talk and communicate with others.
Communicating to establish and maintain contact with people is the most important skills they should all learn. We can not acquire specialized knowledge in many areas, because we can not be experts in everything - we have to choose. But experts on good communication, we must be all.
Following is something that very much will help you to work on this communication. It is a mind map, which I took everything that I consider important is the topic to contact humans. Map powslegislation was mainly based on the book by Dale Carnegie "How to win friends and win over the people." Those who read it will recognize, however, that I added too much from myself:)
Just remember that it may be this map wyuczyć memory, but it still will not do anything if not everything przećwiczycie practice. It should talk:)
PS you need to click the map to be clearly visible. You may copy it, convert and share freely.
PSS What do you think of this as science and mindmapowej convey thoughts?
Thursday, 13 May 2010
Laser Dinghy Number Versus Age
Want to be a creator?
Yesterday there was an interesting situation. It concerned one of my ideas to create something of value. Not give details because they are not now relevant. It is important to science, which pulled out from the event.
Prior to this project perceived as a whole. I did not see that is composed of two, it really separate elements. And that these items do not have to act together! The first one I can identify as "cool", the latter as "difficult." I prefer it to be nice and not too difficult - so I decided to get rid of the second. It turns out that through this project will not collapse. On the contrary - become even greater consistency and value.
Why is earlyj had not noticed that option? After just after a simple procedure - the separation of two elements from each other, look a little to the side, a good question to ask yourself - "what if ...?".
Way to do this to create something extraordinary is to stop listening to "ordinary" people. We must stop listening to "ordinary self" - that is to reject everything that is what we are sure. Convinced that something can not be done otherwise. You have to listen to people nietuzinkowych who have something of his own to share, do not lend themselves to the public.
Most often he is not right. Most of it is some averaging. In this case, saying "the truth is somewhere in between" no issuesis today. You can find many examples from history. I am convinced of it more frequently. The more often and the louder I hear "this is impossible," you fail, "it does in any other way" - the more I know that we work in this direction. Fight the "obvious self-evident." The more obvious something is, the more needs a challenge.
To combat the obvious is true creativity. Creativity, creating in its purest form.
Knowing what is important today. Because you need to decide today. I remember that once when they asked me about who I will be in the future, replied, "I racer." Today we must ask the question andin chief. On whether we firemen, policemen, teachers, businessmen or something else is more important. Now the main question is:
Want to be a creator or a reactor?
Creator - Challenge, you ask tough questions, looking for opportunities, act
Impersonator - not Stand behind you are following the majority, are looking for security, you wait until others do it for you
Yesterday there was an interesting situation. It concerned one of my ideas to create something of value. Not give details because they are not now relevant. It is important to science, which pulled out from the event.
Prior to this project perceived as a whole. I did not see that is composed of two, it really separate elements. And that these items do not have to act together! The first one I can identify as "cool", the latter as "difficult." I prefer it to be nice and not too difficult - so I decided to get rid of the second. It turns out that through this project will not collapse. On the contrary - become even greater consistency and value.
Why is earlyj had not noticed that option? After just after a simple procedure - the separation of two elements from each other, look a little to the side, a good question to ask yourself - "what if ...?".
Way to do this to create something extraordinary is to stop listening to "ordinary" people. We must stop listening to "ordinary self" - that is to reject everything that is what we are sure. Convinced that something can not be done otherwise. You have to listen to people nietuzinkowych who have something of his own to share, do not lend themselves to the public.
Most often he is not right. Most of it is some averaging. In this case, saying "the truth is somewhere in between" no issuesis today. You can find many examples from history. I am convinced of it more frequently. The more often and the louder I hear "this is impossible," you fail, "it does in any other way" - the more I know that we work in this direction. Fight the "obvious self-evident." The more obvious something is, the more needs a challenge.
To combat the obvious is true creativity. Creativity, creating in its purest form.
Knowing what is important today. Because you need to decide today. I remember that once when they asked me about who I will be in the future, replied, "I racer." Today we must ask the question andin chief. On whether we firemen, policemen, teachers, businessmen or something else is more important. Now the main question is:
Want to be a creator or a reactor?
Creator - Challenge, you ask tough questions, looking for opportunities, act
Impersonator - not Stand behind you are following the majority, are looking for security, you wait until others do it for you
Monday, 10 May 2010
Where Can I Buy Naseptin
Why low position?
Since my friend I heard about these words:
"I prefer not to plan anything, because I'm so if these plans do not go ... I go for everything rather pessimistic. From the top is adjusted to the fact that I did not succeed. Thus, if I fail, and so nothing changes. But if something I can make it - then I'm positively surprised. "
This approach I call "low position". In the picture it's a loser - a line on the left:
According to the figure - and according to my observation - people can be put into two categories.
The first men to winners. They have the strength to fight. Do not give up and put on your own.Lose often, but every time they learn, and every time they are better and smarter. Have high and ambitious goals. Thanks to still go forward, still up.
Others people are losers. You do not have the power nor the inclination to fight. Dreams for them will always remain just dreams. They are afraid to take risks, afraid to take a definite decision. Instead of working towards achieving its goals - these goals will not put myself at all. They are afraid of losing, and by all means do not intend to lay low and give up his secure position.
Individual items in the diagram can be described this way:
A - The person does not have the strength to fight. It is sad because I lost
\u0026lt;br /> B - A person who is sad because I lost. Thanks to the experience of loss is smarter and has more strength to fight
C - A person who is happy because I succeeded. Gives her a momentary surge of new energy. Celebrating.
D - A person who is satisfied with the degree of success achieved. With it has even more strength to fight.
Both groups on the successes and failures react in different ways. Now you must decide which group you want to join. What you will take the position?
Since my friend I heard about these words:
"I prefer not to plan anything, because I'm so if these plans do not go ... I go for everything rather pessimistic. From the top is adjusted to the fact that I did not succeed. Thus, if I fail, and so nothing changes. But if something I can make it - then I'm positively surprised. "
This approach I call "low position". In the picture it's a loser - a line on the left:
According to the figure - and according to my observation - people can be put into two categories.
The first men to winners. They have the strength to fight. Do not give up and put on your own.Lose often, but every time they learn, and every time they are better and smarter. Have high and ambitious goals. Thanks to still go forward, still up.
Others people are losers. You do not have the power nor the inclination to fight. Dreams for them will always remain just dreams. They are afraid to take risks, afraid to take a definite decision. Instead of working towards achieving its goals - these goals will not put myself at all. They are afraid of losing, and by all means do not intend to lay low and give up his secure position.
Individual items in the diagram can be described this way:
A - The person does not have the strength to fight. It is sad because I lost
\u0026lt;br /> B - A person who is sad because I lost. Thanks to the experience of loss is smarter and has more strength to fight
C - A person who is happy because I succeeded. Gives her a momentary surge of new energy. Celebrating.
D - A person who is satisfied with the degree of success achieved. With it has even more strength to fight.
Both groups on the successes and failures react in different ways. Now you must decide which group you want to join. What you will take the position?
Friday, 7 May 2010
How Long To Wait Job Application
Four questions that wywindują your efficiency
Einstein said that everything should be as simple as possible, but not simpler.
Following these words - if the efficiency can be presented in a simple (not simplified) - then you do it. Today I present four short questions. Questions, by which I became effective. I guarantee that you ask these four frequently and regularly give better results than reading the four books about time management, the best of the authors:
Question 1 - What is the next action?
The thing taken from David Allen's GTD. It turns out that just any project seen as a "next steps" and instantly a lot easier to control. From now on, alwayse, when it operates on a project, or when he comes to me any case - to decide the next steps. It happens that the next action is to throw the case into the trash, which, moreover I do immediately:)
Question 2 - How can I achieve it faster?
This question helps me to still be focused on the fact that an action to perform even better. This "superiority" is primarily due to savings in time and energy to devote to this activity. Of course, all while maintaining an appropriate level, but without striving for perfection.
Question 3 - What this taught me?
Asking yourself this question so I came into a habit that I do it, even unknowingly:) In my (up toÆ broad) meaning of efficiency, is also learning occupies an important place. The best learning is learning from experience and from his own actions - and we do not draw any science, if not we will ask themselves this simple question. Learning in this way is much more effective than studying in school. It is more a "science of life."
Question 4 - How to look like this activity, I made it perfectly?
It is a question which I use mainly when imagining (visualizing) the objectives and activities. Perfectly is when we have the perfect picture with you at all times while performing the action. Thus we have a vision of how the objective to be attained and strive to do so. WellThis question is used also in action - when we evaluate as we went. Thanks to him we strive for perfection and instead focus on the mistakes we made, we use the experience gained from these mistakes and focus on the ideal image. So we know how to perform this action better next time, not just what mistakes to avoid.
Einstein said that everything should be as simple as possible, but not simpler.
Following these words - if the efficiency can be presented in a simple (not simplified) - then you do it. Today I present four short questions. Questions, by which I became effective. I guarantee that you ask these four frequently and regularly give better results than reading the four books about time management, the best of the authors:
Question 1 - What is the next action?
The thing taken from David Allen's GTD. It turns out that just any project seen as a "next steps" and instantly a lot easier to control. From now on, alwayse, when it operates on a project, or when he comes to me any case - to decide the next steps. It happens that the next action is to throw the case into the trash, which, moreover I do immediately:)
Question 2 - How can I achieve it faster?
This question helps me to still be focused on the fact that an action to perform even better. This "superiority" is primarily due to savings in time and energy to devote to this activity. Of course, all while maintaining an appropriate level, but without striving for perfection.
Question 3 - What this taught me?
Asking yourself this question so I came into a habit that I do it, even unknowingly:) In my (up toÆ broad) meaning of efficiency, is also learning occupies an important place. The best learning is learning from experience and from his own actions - and we do not draw any science, if not we will ask themselves this simple question. Learning in this way is much more effective than studying in school. It is more a "science of life."
Question 4 - How to look like this activity, I made it perfectly?
It is a question which I use mainly when imagining (visualizing) the objectives and activities. Perfectly is when we have the perfect picture with you at all times while performing the action. Thus we have a vision of how the objective to be attained and strive to do so. WellThis question is used also in action - when we evaluate as we went. Thanks to him we strive for perfection and instead focus on the mistakes we made, we use the experience gained from these mistakes and focus on the ideal image. So we know how to perform this action better next time, not just what mistakes to avoid.
Tuesday, 4 May 2010
Watery Clear Cm Before Period
Where is time?
"I have no time for anything" - I hear those words very often, more frequently. Although the day is still 24 hours, it seems that until we suddenly disappeared. What's more - we are working longer and more efficiently than before - and yet we have too little time ...
We use many different types of "czasooszczędzaczy. We have cars, airplanes, trains, make your trip instead of the last few days only takes a few hours. With new methods of work organization as the teams carry out projects and create great organizations, each of which has designated its field of operation as a whole and create something great at an accelerating pace. The greatest invention of humanity - internet - issuesia that contact with a person at the other end of the world takes us a few seconds ...
Why, then, although it is not enough time?
First we have to understand that sometimes you can not manage. Someone who talks about managing time - weaves nonsense. This is fiction! We can only manage it, as that term is being used. We can only manage their operations. And this is the answer.
In a world where everything is fast - we must act as quickly. We must again learn to work well, and I believe it is important what we have in today's world to learn. If you know the rules and principles governing the right action and apply them in our lives - if only. This is called PRAwdziwa efficiency.
I'll write about this more than once. Now I will share some remarks on the action. All stem from my personal observation: more time it takes people to translate the actions and coming up with excuses than the activity itself. When he starts to work, it appears that this is definitely easier, faster and requiring less energy than previously thought. It's that time flows differently in different places due to the intensity of our activities. For lack of time most complain about those who are doing the least. Rethinking of how to perform an action before they perform, saves at least half the time.
"I have no time for anything" - I hear those words very often, more frequently. Although the day is still 24 hours, it seems that until we suddenly disappeared. What's more - we are working longer and more efficiently than before - and yet we have too little time ...
We use many different types of "czasooszczędzaczy. We have cars, airplanes, trains, make your trip instead of the last few days only takes a few hours. With new methods of work organization as the teams carry out projects and create great organizations, each of which has designated its field of operation as a whole and create something great at an accelerating pace. The greatest invention of humanity - internet - issuesia that contact with a person at the other end of the world takes us a few seconds ...
Why, then, although it is not enough time?
First we have to understand that sometimes you can not manage. Someone who talks about managing time - weaves nonsense. This is fiction! We can only manage it, as that term is being used. We can only manage their operations. And this is the answer.
In a world where everything is fast - we must act as quickly. We must again learn to work well, and I believe it is important what we have in today's world to learn. If you know the rules and principles governing the right action and apply them in our lives - if only. This is called PRAwdziwa efficiency.
I'll write about this more than once. Now I will share some remarks on the action. All stem from my personal observation: more time it takes people to translate the actions and coming up with excuses than the activity itself. When he starts to work, it appears that this is definitely easier, faster and requiring less energy than previously thought. It's that time flows differently in different places due to the intensity of our activities. For lack of time most complain about those who are doing the least. Rethinking of how to perform an action before they perform, saves at least half the time.
Saturday, 1 May 2010
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)